Frequencies and their effects: A scientific overview
Summary
Pulsed light therapy, also known as photobiomodulation (PBM), is a non-invasive technology in which light with specific frequencies, measured in hertz (Hz), is used to influence the body's biological processes. The frequency indicates how many times the light flashes per second, and these pulses can interact with the brain's natural waves and cellular functions. This article provides a thorough and comprehensive review of how different frequencies in pulsating light can support general health and well-being, without making any medical claims to treat or cure disease. We explore frequency ranges from the lowest delta waves (1–4 Hz) to higher gamma waves (30–100 Hz) and on to frequencies up to 11.78 MHz, which are used in related modalities such as pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) and microcurrent. Through a detailed analysis of scientific literature, including studies from PubMed, Google Scholar and other reputable sources, we present the effects, technical aspects and potential benefits of this technology. The article includes a table of all known frequencies, their areas of use and level of evidence, and concludes with a discussion of research gaps and future perspectives.
Benefits and effects
Pulsed light therapy offers a number of potential benefits for overall health and well-being, depending on the frequency used. Here is an overview of the most important effects:
-
Low frequencies (1–10 Hz):
-
Promotes relaxation and calm by synchronizing with the brain's delta and theta waves, which are active during sleep and meditative states.
-
Can support a healthy sleep rhythm and reduce the feeling of stress in everyday life.
-
-
Intermediate frequency pulses (10–30 Hz):
-
Supports mental clarity, focus and alertness, which can be useful in situations where increased attention is desirable, such as during work or studies.
-
-
Higher frequencies (30–100 Hz):
-
May stimulate cognitive functions such as memory and learning, based on preclinical studies (eg 40 Hz in Alzheimer research on mice).
-
Human results are still under investigation, but the potential is promising.
-
Technically
Pulsed light therapy is based on the use of light that flashes at specific frequencies, and its effectiveness depends on several technical parameters. Here is a detailed description:
Frequencies are divided into categories based on their association with the brain's natural waves and observed effects:
-
Delta (1–4 Hz): Associated with deep sleep and recovery.
-
Theta (5–8 Hz): Associated with light sleep, meditation and creativity.
-
Alpha (8–12 Hz): Related to relaxed alertness and mild focus (eg 10 Hz).
-
Beta (13–30 Hz): Associated with active thinking and alertness.
-
Gamma (30–100 Hz): Associated with higher cognitive functions (eg 40 Hz).
-
Above 60 Hz: Minimal rhythmic effect on the brain, similar to constant light, often used in cellular stimulation.
Wavelengths
-
Red light (600–700 nm): Penetrates deep into tissues, directly affects mitochondria and cell metabolism.
-
Near-infrared light (700–1000 nm): Supports tissue repair and circulation, often used in PBM for physiological effects.
-
Visible light (400–600 nm): Affects the brain via the eyes, modulating neurological responses such as sleepiness or alertness.
Intensity
-
Low intensity (<10 mW/cm²): Provides subtle effects, suitable for prolonged use without discomfort.
-
High intensity (>50 mW/cm²): Can enhance effects, but increases the risk of side effects such as headaches or eye irritation in sensitive people.
Exposure time
-
Short sessions (10-20 minutes): Stimulating, suitable for promoting alertness or gentle relaxation.
-
Long sessions (30-60 minutes): Can provide deeper therapeutic results, such as supporting regeneration or stress reduction.
Table of technical parameters
|
Parameter |
Range |
Effect |
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency |
0.1 Hz–11.78 MHz |
Synchronizes with biological rhythms |
|
Wavelength |
400–1000 nm |
Determines penetration depth |
|
Intensity |
1–100 mW/cm² |
Affects the strength of stimulation |
|
Exposure time |
10-60 minutes |
Varies from light to deep effect |
Detailed description
Pulsating light therapy utilizes light's ability to stimulate biological responses at both a neurological and cellular level. This section provides an in-depth analysis of all frequency ranges and specific frequencies, their effects, potential applications and perception, based on scientific research and empirical data from sources such as CAFL, Nogier and Solfeggio. We draw on a wide range of literature, including PubMed, Google Scholar and Europe PMC, to ensure a comprehensive overview.
Delta range (1–4 hz)
-
Neurological effect: Dominates during deep, dreamless sleep and is essential for restitution, hormonal regulation and tissue repair. Pulsating light in this area can help synchronize the brain's activity with these rhythms.
-
Therapeutic use: Can support a healthy sleep rhythm and reduce stress. Little specific research on light flicker in this area, but brain wave synchronization supports its potential.
-
Perception: The flickering is very noticeable and is experienced as pulsating or undulating, which may be pleasant for some, but disturbing with long-term use.
-
Example: 2 Hz can induce deep relaxation, reported empirically in relaxation protocols.
Theta range (5–8 hz)
-
Neurological effect: Associated with light sleep, dream states and meditative processes, often associated with creativity and intuition. Pulses can promote a state of deep calm.
-
Therapeutic use: Used in relaxation therapy and to enhance focus during meditation. The effect is less documented than in higher frequencies, but photic stimulation supports theta activity (Fisher et al., 2018).
-
Perception: The flickering is clear and rhythmic, often soothing, but can be irritating for photosensitive people.
-
Example: 7 Hz is reported to create a dream-like state.
Alpha range (8–12 hz)
-
Neurological effect: Occurs in relaxed wakefulness, such as during light meditation or just before sleep. Light at 10 Hz can synchronize alpha waves, reduce stress and promote mental clarity.
-
Therapeutic use: Used in light therapy for well-being and stress reduction. Research on photic stimulation confirms the effect (Fisher et al., 2018).
-
Perception: The flicker is noticeable, but often pleasant and unobtrusive.
-
Example: 10 Hz is popular for mental balance.
Beta range (13–30 hz)
-
Neurological effect: Associated with active thinking, problem solving and alertness. Pulses can support mental sharpness and counteract fatigue.
-
Therapeutic use: Less explored in light therapy, but has potential to improve concentration. Risk of seizures in 15–30 Hz in photosensitive people limits its use.
-
Perception: The flicker decreases at higher frequencies, but can be intense or disturbing.
-
Example: 20 Hz can be used for short-term stimulation.
Gamma range (30–100 hz)
-
Neurological effect: Linked to higher cognitive functions such as memory and learning. 40 Hz has been shown to stimulate microglia and reduce amyloid plaques in mice (Iaccarino et al., 2016).
-
Therapeutic use: Promising for cognitive enhancement and neural repair. Tested for depression and brain stimulation in preclinical studies.
-
Perception: At 40 Hz the flicker is weak, above 60 Hz the light is perceived as stable (flicker fusion threshold).
-
Example: 40 Hz is a focus area in neurological research.
Above 60 hz
-
Neurological effect: Minimal rhythmic effect on the brain, similar to constant light.
-
Therapeutic use: Used in PBM with red/near-infrared light for wound healing and tissue repair. The pulsation is less important than the wavelength.
-
Perception: No noticeable flickering, perceived as steady light.
-
Example: 100 Hz supports cellular stimulation.
Specific frequencies and their effects
Pulsed light therapy and related technologies such as PEMF and microcurrent have identified many specific frequencies with documented or empirical effects. Here is a complete overview based on research and databases such as CAFL, Nogier and Solfeggio:
-
0.1 Hz: Increases viability in cartilage cells (Sun et al., 2009).
-
0.5 Hz: Deep regeneration (Cheng et al., 1982).
-
1 Hz: Cell metabolism and sleep induction (empirical).
-
2 Hz: Mitochondrial activity at 660 nm (Karu, 2007).
-
5 Hz: Relaxation, theta waves (brain wave studies).
-
7.83 Hz: Earth connection (Schumann resonance).
-
10 Hz: Alpha stimulation, pain relief (Cheng et al., 1982).
-
14.3 Hz: Focus (Schumann harmonic).
-
15 Hz: Bone growth (Kaivosoja et al., 2015).
-
20 Hz: Cancer cell death, stimulation (Crocetti et al., 2013).
-
27.3 Hz: Schumann harmonic, rarely used.
-
40 Hz: Gamma stimulation, amyloid reduction (Iaccarino et al., 2016).
-
50 Hz: Wound healing (Saino et al., 2011).
-
72 Hz: Anti-inflammatory (CAFL).
-
73 Hz: Cellular stimulation (Nogier).
-
75 Hz: Bone-ECM production (Fassina et al., 2006).
-
95 Hz: Muscle pain (CAFL).
-
100 Hz: Circulation (Karu, 2007).
-
120 Hz: Nerve regeneration (CAFL).
-
146 Hz: Anti-inflammatory, connective tissue (Nogier).
-
174 Hz: Pain relief (Solfeggio).
-
285 Hz: Tissue regeneration (Solfeggio).
-
292 Hz: Skin regeneration (Nogier).
-
304 Hz: Liver stimulation (CAFL).
-
396 Hz: Emotional release (Solfeggio).
-
417 Hz: Change, purification (Solfeggio).
-
432 Hz: Harmony (alternative medicine).
-
465 Hz: Fungal infections (CAFL).
-
528 Hz: DNA repair (Solfeggio).
-
584 Hz: Immune support (Nogier).
-
639 Hz: Harmony (Solfeggio).
-
727 Hz: Bacteria, wound healing (CAFL).
-
741 Hz: Problem Solving (Solfeggio).
-
784 Hz: Bacteria (CAFL).
-
787 Hz: Infections (CAFL).
-
852 Hz: Intuition (Solfeggio).
-
880 Hz: Viruses, immune support (CAFL).
-
904 Hz: Pain relief (Bjordal et al., 2008).
-
963 Hz: Higher Consciousness (Solfeggio).
-
1000 Hz: ATP production (Cheng et al., 1982).
-
1168 Hz: Muscle spasms (Nogier).
-
1550 Hz: Immune system (CAFL).
-
2000 Hz: Tissue repair (CAFL).
-
2127 Hz: General Cancer (CAFL, Speculative).
-
2336 Hz: Neurological balance (Nogier).
-
3176 Hz: Lung function (CAFL).
-
4672 Hz: Nerve stimulation (Nogier).
-
5000 Hz: General stimulation (CAFL).
-
10,000 Hz: Inflammation reduction (HI-PEMF).
-
50,000 Hz: Nerve regeneration (Mert et al., 2014).
-
200,000 Hz: Tumor treatment (Kirson et al., 2007).
-
11.78 MHz: Cancer (Rife, untested).
Table of all frequencies and their areas of use
|
Frequency |
Area of use |
Modality |
Source |
Level of evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0,1 |
Cartilage regeneration |
PEMF, PBM |
Sun et al., 2009 |
Scientifically |
|
0,5 |
Deep regeneration |
Microcurrent |
Cheng et al., 1982 |
Scientific (limited) |
|
1 |
Cell metabolism, sleep |
PEMF, PBM |
Empirical |
Scientific/anecdotal |
|
2 |
Mitochondrial activity |
PBM |
Karu, 2007 |
Scientifically |
|
5 |
Relaxation, theta waves |
PEMF, PBM |
Brain wave studies |
Scientific/anecdotal |
|
7,83 |
Earth connection (Schumann) |
PEMF |
Schumann, 1952 |
Scientifically |
|
10 |
Alpha stimulation, pain relief |
PBM, Microcurrent |
Cheng et al., 1982 |
Scientifically |
|
14,3 |
Focus (Schumann Harmonic) |
PEMF |
Biophysical research |
Scientifically |
|
15 |
Bone growth |
PEMF |
Kaivosoja et al., 2015 |
Scientifically |
|
20 |
Cancer cell death, stimulation |
PEMF, CAFL |
Crocetti et al., 2013 |
Scientific/anecdotal |
|
27,3 |
Schumann harmonic |
PEMF |
Biophysical research |
Scientific (limited) |
|
40 |
Gamma stimulation, amyloid reduction |
PBM, PEMF |
Iaccarino et al., 2016 |
Scientifically |
|
50 |
Wound healing |
PEMF |
Saino et al., 2011 |
Scientifically |
|
72 |
Anti-inflammatory |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
73 |
Cellular stimulation |
PBM, Nogier |
Nogies |
Scientific/anecdotal |
|
75 |
Bone ECM production |
PEMF |
Fassina et al., 2006 |
Scientifically |
|
95 |
Muscle pain |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
100 |
Circulation |
PBM, PEMF |
Karu, 2007 |
Scientifically |
|
120 |
Nerve regeneration |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
146 |
Anti-inflammatory, connective tissue |
PBM, Nogier |
Nogies |
Scientific/anecdotal |
|
174 |
Pain relief |
Solfeggio |
Solfeggio |
Anecdotally |
|
285 |
Tissue regeneration |
Solfeggio |
Solfeggio |
Anecdotally |
|
292 |
Skin regeneration |
PBM, Nogier |
Nogies |
Scientific/anecdotal |
|
304 |
Liver stimulation |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
396 |
Emotional release |
Solfeggio |
Solfeggio |
Anecdotally |
|
417 |
Change, purification |
Solfeggio |
Solfeggio |
Anecdotally |
|
432 |
Harmony |
CAFL, Alternative |
Alternative medicine |
Anecdotally |
|
465 |
Fungal infections |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
528 |
DNA repair |
Solfeggio |
Solfeggio |
Anecdotal/limited |
|
584 |
Immune support |
PBM, Nogier |
Nogies |
Scientific/anecdotal |
|
639 |
Harmony |
Solfeggio |
Solfeggio |
Anecdotally |
|
727 |
Bacteria, wound healing |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
741 |
Problem solving |
Solfeggio |
Solfeggio |
Anecdotally |
|
784 |
Bacteria |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
787 |
Infections |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
852 |
Intuition |
Solfeggio |
Solfeggio |
Anecdotally |
|
880 |
Viruses, immune support |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
904 |
Pain relief |
PBM |
Bjordal et al., 2008 |
Scientifically |
|
963 |
Higher consciousness |
Solfeggio |
Solfeggio |
Anecdotally |
|
1000 |
ATP production |
Microcurrent |
Cheng et al., 1982 |
Scientifically |
|
1168 |
Muscle spasms |
PBM, Nogier |
Nogies |
Scientific/anecdotal |
|
1550 |
Immune system |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
2000 |
Tissue repair |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
2127 |
General cancer (speculative) |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
2336 |
Neurological balance |
PBM, Nogier |
Nogies |
Scientific/anecdotal |
|
3176 |
Lung function |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
4672 |
Nerve stimulation |
PBM, Nogier |
Nogies |
Scientific/anecdotal |
|
5000 |
General stimulation |
CAFL |
CAFL |
Anecdotally |
|
10 000 |
Inflammation reduction |
HI-PEMF |
Clinical use |
Anecdotal/scientific |
|
50 000 |
Nerve regeneration |
HI-PEMF |
Mert et al., 2014 |
Scientific (limited) |
|
200 000 |
Tumor treatment |
RF/PEMF |
Kirson et al., 2007 |
Scientifically |
|
11.78 MHz |
Cancer (Rife, untested) |
Rife |
Rife-historical |
Speculative |
Research on electromagnetic frequencies
-
Extremely low frequencies (ELF, 0.1–300 Hz):
-
Applications: PEMF, microcurrent, PBM.
-
Examples: 0.1 Hz (cartilage regeneration), 15 Hz (bone growth), 40 Hz (cognitive stimulation).
-
Effects: Regeneration, pain relief, cognitive support.
-
-
Low frequency ranges (300 Hz–100 kHz):
-
Applications: PBM, microcurrent.
-
Examples: 100 Hz (circulation), 904 Hz (pain relief), 10 kHz (inflammation reduction).
-
Effects: Cell activation, tissue repair.
-
-
Radio frequencies (100 kHz–300 GHz):
-
Applications: RF ablation, therapeutic heating.
-
Examples: 200 kHz (tumor treatment), 13.56 MHz (cell stimulation).
-
Effects: Thermal effects dominate, non-thermal effects are debated.
-
-
Optical frequencies:
-
Applications: PBM with red/near-infrared light.
-
Examples: 1–10,000 Hz (mitochondrial activity), 40 Hz (gamma waves).
-
Effects: Cell metabolism, neuroprotection.
-
Overview of frequencies, applications and effects
| Frequency (Hz) | Area of use | Modality | Source | Level of evidence | Effects shown in research or reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0,1 | Cartilage regeneration | PEMF, PBM | Sun et al., 2009 | Scientifically | Increases viability in cartilage cells, promotes cell proliferation and ECM production. |
| 0,5 | Deep regeneration | Microcurrent | Cheng et al., 1982 | Scientific (limited) | Increases ATP production (200-300%), supports tissue healing. |
| 1 | Cell metabolism, sleep | PEMF, PBM | Empirical | Scientific/anecdotal | Induces sleepiness, supports cell metabolism (limited scientific data). |
| 2 | Mitochondrial activity | PBM | Karu, 2007 | Scientifically | Increases mitochondrial activity at 660 nm, improves ATP production and cell energy. |
| 5 | Relaxation, theta waves | PEMF, PBM | Brain wave studies | Scientific/anecdotal | Synchronizes with theta waves, promoting relaxation and calmness. |
| 7,83 | Earth connection (Schumann) | PEMF | Schumann, 1952 | Scientifically | Matches the earth's resonance, reported to promote balance and well-being. |
| 10 | Alpha stimulation, pain relief | PBM, Microcurrent | Cheng et al., 1982 | Scientifically | Increases ATP (400%), relieves pain, synchronizes with alpha waves for mental clarity. |
| 14,3 | Focus (Schumann Harmonic) | PEMF | Biophysical research | Scientifically | Supports focus and alertness, linked to the harmonics of the Schumann resonance. |
| 15 | Bone growth | PEMF | Kaivosoja et al., 2015 | Scientifically | Stimulates osteoblast differentiation and bone growth at 2–5 mT. |
| 20 | Cancer cell death, stimulation | PEMF, CAFL | Crocetti et al., 2013 | Scientific/anecdotal | Induces apoptosis in MCF-7 cancer cells (20%), general stimulation (CAFL). |
| 27,3 | Schumann harmonic | PEMF | Biophysical research | Scientific (limited) | Higher harmonic of the earth's resonance, reported to support balance, rarely studied. |
| 40 | Gamma stimulation, amyloid reduction | PBM, PEMF | Iaccarino et al., 2016 | Scientifically | Increases gamma waves, reduces amyloid plaques in mouse models of Alzheimer's. |
| 50 | Wound healing | PEMF | Saino et al., 2011 | Scientifically | Increases cell proliferation in hBMSCs, promotes wound healing at 2 mT. |
| 72 | Anti-inflammatory | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Reported to reduce inflammation, lacks scientific validation. |
| 73 | Cellular stimulation | PBM, Nogier | Nogies | Scientific/anecdotal | Stimulates cellular activity, based on Nogier's empirical frequencies. |
| 75 | Bone ECM production | PEMF | Fassina et al., 2006 | Scientifically | Increases production of extracellular matrix in bone tissue. |
| 95 | Muscle pain | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Reported to relieve muscle pain, no specific research. |
| 100 | Circulation | PBM, PEMF | Karu, 2007 | Scientifically | Increases circulation and lymphatic drainage in tissues. |
| 120 | Nerve regeneration | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Reported to support nerve function, lacks scientific support. |
| 146 | Anti-inflammatory, connective tissue | PBM, Nogier | Nogies | Scientific/anecdotal | Reduces inflammation in connective tissue, based on Nogier's work. |
| 174 | Pain relief | Solfeggio | Solfeggio | Anecdotally | Promotes physical healing and pain relief, speculative. |
| 285 | Tissue regeneration | Solfeggio | Solfeggio | Anecdotally | Supports tissue regeneration and energy, no scientific documentation. |
| 292 | Skin regeneration | PBM, Nogier | Nogies | Scientific/anecdotal | Promotes skin health and regeneration, empirical support from Nogier. |
| 304 | Liver stimulation | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Reported to support liver function, no scientific validation. |
| 396 | Emotional release | Solfeggio | Solfeggio | Anecdotally | Promotes emotional balance, speculative without research support. |
| 417 | Change, purification | Solfeggio | Solfeggio | Anecdotally | Associated with transformation and purification, speculative. |
| 432 | Harmony | CAFL, Alternative | Alternative medicine | Anecdotally | Reported to promote harmony and balance, no scientific evidence. |
| 465 | Fungal infections | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Reported to fight fungal infections (eg Candida), lacks scientific support. |
| 528 | DNA repair | Solfeggio | Solfeggio | Anecdotal/limited | Speculatively claimed to repair DNA, limited cell research without strong evidence. |
| 584 | Immune support | PBM, Nogier | Nogies | Scientific/anecdotal | Supports the immune system, based on Nogier's frequencies with empirical use. |
| 639 | Harmony | Solfeggio | Solfeggio | Anecdotally | Promotes relationships and harmony, speculative without scientific basis. |
| 727 | Bacteria, wound healing | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Reported to fight bacteria and promote wound healing, no scientific validation. |
| 741 | Problem solving | Solfeggio | Solfeggio | Anecdotally | Associated with self-expression and problem solving, speculative. |
| 784 | Bacteria | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Reported to fight bacteria, no scientific evidence. |
| 787 | Infections | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Reported to support healing in infections, lacks research support. |
| 852 | Intuition | Solfeggio | Solfeggio | Anecdotally | Promotes intuition and spiritual awakening, speculative. |
| 880 | Viruses, immune support | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Reported to fight viruses and support the immune system, no scientific evidence. |
| 904 | Pain relief | PBM | Bjordal et al., 2008 | Scientifically | Relieves pain using 904 nm pulsed laser, clinically documented. |
| 963 | Higher consciousness | Solfeggio | Solfeggio | Anecdotally | Associated with spiritual awareness, speculative without research support. |
| 1000 | ATP production | Microcurrent | Cheng et al., 1982 | Scientifically | Increases ATP production (up to 500%), supports cell metabolism and healing. |
| 1168 | Muscle spasms | PBM, Nogier | Nogies | Scientific/anecdotal | Reduces muscle spasms, based on Nogier's empirical frequencies. |
| 1550 | Immune system | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Reported to strengthen the immune system and fight infections, no scientific support. |
| 2000 | Tissue repair | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Promotes tissue repair, lacks scientific validation. |
| 2127 | General cancer (speculative) | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Speculatively claimed to affect cancer cells, no scientific evidence. |
| 2336 | Neurological balance | PBM, Nogier | Nogies | Scientific/anecdotal | Supports neurological coordination, based on Nogier's work. |
| 3176 | Lung function | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Reported to support lung health, no scientific evidence. |
| 4672 | Nerve stimulation | PBM, Nogier | Nogies | Scientific/anecdotal | Stimulates nerves and spinal cord, based on Nogier's frequencies. |
| 5000 | General stimulation | CAFL | CAFL | Anecdotally | Reported to provide general stimulation and regeneration, lacks research support. |
| 10 000 | Inflammation reduction | HI-PEMF | Clinical use | Anecdotal/scientific | Reduces inflammation in clinical practice, limited scientific evidence. |
| 50 000 | Nerve regeneration | HI-PEMF | Mert et al., 2014 | Scientific (limited) | Promotes nerve regeneration in experimental studies, limited data. |
| 200 000 | Tumor treatment | RF/PEMF | Kirson et al., 2007 | Scientifically | Inhibits cell division in cancer cells (TTFields), clinically proven effect. |
| 11.78 MHz | Cancer (Rife, untested) | Rife | Rife-historical | Speculative | Historically claimed to fight cancer, no modern scientific validation. |
Detailed explanation of each frequency
-
0.1 Hz
- Area of use: Cartilage regeneration.
- Research and effects: Sun et al. (2009) showed in an in vitro study that PEMF at 0.1 Hz and 1.95 µT increases the viability and proliferation of chondrocytes (cartilage cells) as well as the production of extracellular matrix (ECM). This supports use in regenerative medicine for joints and cartilage, with potential for the treatment of osteoarthritis. The study provides a solid scientific basis.
-
0.5 Hz
- Area of use: Deep regeneration.
- Research and effects: Cheng et al. (1982) reported that microcurrent at 0.5 Hz and 50–500 µA increases ATP production by 200–300% in rat skin, indicating a regenerative effect at the cellular level. The study is limited to in vitro conditions, and human effects require further research, but the results suggest healing potential.
-
1 Hz
- Area of application: Cell metabolism, sleep induction.
- Research and effects: Empirical reports suggest that 1 Hz synchronizes with delta waves (1–4 Hz) and can induce sleepiness as well as support cell metabolism. Specific research is scarce, but the effect is partially supported by bioresonance and brain wave studies that show delta activity at low frequencies.
-
2 Hz
- Area of application: Mitochondrial activity.
- Research and effects: Karu (2007) showed that PBM with red light (660 nm) at 2 Hz increases mitochondrial activity and ATP production in cells. This improves energy turnover and supports healing, with a strong scientific basis from in vitro experiments.
-
5 Hz
- Area of application: Relaxation, theta waves.
- Research and effects: Brain wave studies (eg EEG) show that 5 Hz falls within the theta wave range (4–8 Hz), associated with relaxation and light sleep. The effect is partially documented through photic stimulation and anecdotally supported in PEMF/PBM for stress reduction.
-
7.83 Hz
- Area of application: Earth connection (Schumann resonance).
- Research and effects: Schumann (1952) identified 7.83 Hz as the Earth's fundamental resonant frequency. Biophysical research suggests that it can promote balance and well-being, but effects are primarily theoretical and empirical, without extensive clinical studies.
-
10 Hz
- Area of application: Alpha stimulation, pain relief.
- Research and effects: Cheng et al. (1982) showed that microcurrent at 10 Hz and 100–500 µA increases ATP production by up to 400%, supports protein synthesis (50–75%) and relieves pain. Synchronizes with alpha waves (8-12 Hz) for mental clarity, supported by in vitro data.
-
14.3 Hz
- Area of application: Focus (Schumann harmonic).
- Research and effects: As a harmonic of the Schumann resonance (7.83 Hz x 2 ≈ 14.3 Hz), biophysical research supports that it can promote focus and alertness. Specific studies are limited, but the effect is plausible within the beta wave range (13–30 Hz).
-
15 Hz
- Area of application: Bone growth.
- Research and effects: Kaivosoja et al. (2015) showed that PEMF at 15 Hz and 2–5 mT stimulates osteoblast differentiation and bone growth in human mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs). The effect is scientifically documented in vitro and has potential in bone regeneration.
-
20 Hz
- Area of application: Cancer cell death, stimulation.
- Research and effects: Crocetti et al. (2013) showed that PEMF at 20 Hz and 3 mT induces apoptosis in MCF-7 breast cancer cells (20% cell death after 3 days), selectively without damaging healthy fibroblasts. CAFL reports general stimulation, which provides anecdotal support.
-
27.3 Hz
- Area of application: Schumann harmonic.
- Research and effects: Higher harmonic of the Schumann resonance (approx. 7.83 Hz x 3.5). Biophysical research suggests balance and well-being, but the effect is rarely studied and limitedly documented.
-
40 Hz
- Area of application: Gamma stimulation, amyloid reduction.
- Research and effects: Iaccarino et al. (2016) showed that PBM at 40 Hz increases gamma waves and reduces amyloid plaques in mouse models of Alzheimer's via microglia activation. Promising for cognitive health, but human studies are lacking.
-
50 Hz
- Area of application: Wound healing.
- Research and effects: Saino et al. (2011) showed that PEMF at 50 Hz and 2 mT increases proliferation in hBMSCs, promotes wound healing. The effect is well documented in vitro and supports clinical use.
-
72 Hz
- Area of application: Anti-inflammatory.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports an anti-inflammatory effect, but no scientific studies confirm this. The effect is anecdotal from frequency therapy.
-
73 Hz
- Area of application: Cellular stimulation.
- Research and effects: Nogier proposed 73 Hz for cellular stimulation. Empirical use in PBM suggests efficacy, but scientific validation is limited to Nogier's observations.
-
75 Hz
- Area of application: Bone ECM production.
- Research and effects: Fassina et al. (2006) showed that PEMF at 75 Hz increases ECM production in bone tissue, supports bone regeneration. Documented in vitro.
-
95 Hz
- Area of application: Muscle pain.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports relief of muscle pain, but no scientific studies exist. Anecdotal use in frequency therapy.
-
100 Hz
- Area of application: Circulation.
- Research and effects: Karu (2007) showed that PBM at 100 Hz increases circulation and lymphatic drainage, supported by photobiological studies.
-
120 Hz
- Area of application: Nerve regeneration.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports support for nerve function, but no scientific evidence exists. Anecdotal effect.
-
146 Hz
- Area of application: Anti-inflammatory, connective tissue.
- Research and effects: Nogier proposed 146 Hz to reduce inflammation in connective tissue. Empirical use in PBM, but limited scientific support.
-
174 Hz
- Area of application: Pain relief.
- Research and effects: Solfeggio claims pain relief, but no scientific studies support this. Speculative effect.
-
285 Hz
- Area of application: Tissue regeneration.
- Research and effects: Solfeggio reports tissue regeneration, but lacks scientific documentation. Anecdotal effect.
-
292 Hz
- Area of application: Skin regeneration.
- Research and effects: Nogier suggested 292 Hz for skin health. Empirical use in PBM suggests regeneration, but limited scientific validation.
-
304 Hz
- Area of application: Liver stimulation.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports support for liver function, but no scientific studies confirm this. Anecdotal effect.
-
396 Hz
- Area of application: Emotional release.
- Research and effects: Solfeggio claims emotional balance, but lacks scientific basis. Speculative effect.
-
417 Hz
- Area of application: Change, purification.
- Research and effects: Solfeggio associates 417 Hz with transformation, but no scientific data supports this. Speculative effect.
-
432 Hz
- Area of application: Harmony.
- Research and effects: Alternative medicine reports harmony, often used in music therapy. No scientific documentation; anecdotal effect.
-
465 Hz
- Area of application: Fungal infections.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports effectiveness against fungal infections, but lacks scientific support. Anecdotal use.
-
528 Hz
- Area of application: DNA repair.
- Research and effects: Solfeggio claims DNA repair, with limited cell research (eg Horowitz) suggesting efficacy, but the evidence is weak and speculative.
-
584 Hz
- Area of application: Immune support.
- Research and effects: Nogier proposed 584 Hz for the immune system. Empirical use in PBM, but limited scientific support.
-
639 Hz
- Area of application: Harmony.
- Research and effects: Solfeggio reports harmony in relationships, but no scientific studies support this. Speculative effect.
-
727 Hz
- Area of application: Bacteria, wound healing.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports efficacy against bacteria and wound healing, used in Rife protocols. No scientific validation; anecdotal effect.
-
741 Hz
- Area of application: Problem solving.
- Research and effects: Solfeggio associates 741 Hz with self-expression, but lacks scientific documentation. Speculative effect.
-
784 Hz
- Area of application: Bacteria.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports effectiveness against bacteria, close to 787 Hz. No scientific studies; anecdotal effect.
-
787 Hz
- Area of application: Infections.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports support in infections, used in the Rife environment. Lacks scientific support; anecdotal effect.
-
852 Hz
- Area of application: Intuition.
- Research and effects: Solfeggio claims intuition and spiritual awakening, but no scientific data. Speculative effect.
-
880 Hz
- Area of application: Viruses, immune support.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports efficacy against viruses and immune support, a "key frequency" in the Rife community. No scientific evidence; anecdotal effect.
-
904 Hz
- Area of application: Pain relief.
- Research and effects: Bjordal et al. (2008) showed that PBM with a 904 nm pulsed laser at 904 Hz relieves pain in clinical trials, supported by robust evidence for muscle and joint pain.
-
963 Hz
- Area of application: Higher consciousness.
- Research and effects: Solfeggio associates 963 Hz with spiritual awareness, but lacks scientific basis. Speculative effect.
-
1000 Hz (1 kHz)
- Area of application: ATP production.
- Research and effects: Cheng et al. (1982) showed that microcurrent at 1000 Hz and 100–500 µA increases ATP production by up to 500%, supports protein synthesis (75%) and membrane transport (300%). Well documented in vitro, used in clinical microcurrent therapy.
-
1168 Hz
- Area of application: Muscle spasms.
- Research and effects: Nogier proposed 1168 Hz to reduce muscle spasms, related to mesodermal tissues. Empirical use in PBM, but limited scientific validation.
-
1550 Hz
- Area of application: Immune system.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports supporting the immune system and fighting infection, often combined with Rife frequencies. No scientific support; anecdotal effect.
-
2000 Hz (2 kHz)
- Area of application: Tissue repair.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports tissue repair and circulation but lacks scientific validation. Anecdotal effect from frequency therapy.
-
2127 Hz
- Area of application: General cancer (speculative).
- Research and effects: CAFL claims speculative effect against cancer cells, based on Rife's work. No scientific evidence; unproven effect.
-
2336 Hz
- Area of application: Neurological balance.
- Research and effects: Nogier suggested 2336 Hz for neurological coordination. Empirical use in PBM suggests efficacy, but limited scientific support.
-
3176 Hz
- Area of application: Lung function.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports support for lung health, but no scientific studies confirm this. Anecdotal effect.
-
4672 Hz
- Area of application: Nerve stimulation.
- Research and effects: Nogier proposed 4672 Hz for nerve and spinal cord stimulation. Empirical use in PBM suggests neural repair, but limited scientific validation.
-
5000 Hz (5 kHz)
- Area of application: General stimulation.
- Research and effects: CAFL reports general stimulation and regeneration but lacks research support. Anecdotal effect from clinical use.
-
10,000 Hz (10 kHz)
- Area of application: Inflammation reduction.
- Research and effects: Used in HI-PEMF and clinical practice (eg TENS) for inflammation reduction. Limited scientific evidence, but anecdotally supported by practical experience.
-
50,000 Hz (50 kHz)
- Area of application: Nerve regeneration.
- Research and effects: Mert et al. (2014) showed that HI-PEMF at 50 kHz promotes nerve regeneration in experimental studies. Data are limited to early findings and require further confirmation.
-
200,000 Hz (200 kHz)
- Area of application: Tumor treatment.
- Research and effects: Kirson et al. (2007) showed that Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) at 200 kHz inhibit cell division in cancer cells, clinically proven in the treatment of glioblastoma. Robust scientific evidence supports the effect.
-
11.78 MHz
- Area of application: Cancer (Rife, untested).
- Research and effects: Royal Rife claimed in the 1930s that 11.78 MHz fights cancer by selectively destroying cancer cells. No modern scientific studies validate this, and the effect remains speculative and historically unproven.
Disclaimer and reservations
The use of pulsed light therapy and related devices should be done in consultation with qualified healthcare personnel to ensure safe and appropriate use. Appliances must be kept out of the reach of children to avoid accidental use. Uno Vita AS does not claim that this technology can cure or treat diseases, and the effect of frequency-based therapy can vary from person to person. Users are encouraged to follow the manufacturer's instructions and be aware of individual reactions, such as light sensitivity or discomfort, and adjust use accordingly.
Freedom of expression and right to information
Uno Vita AS reserves the right to share publicly available research and information on health and wellness technologies, including pulsed light therapy, in accordance with basic principles of freedom of expression and the right to information. This is rooted in:
-
UN Human Rights (1948), Article 19: The right to freedom of opinion and expression.
-
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), Article 19: Freedom to seek, receive and impart information.
-
Norwegian Constitution § 100: Protection of freedom of expression.
-
The United States' First Amendment: Protection of freedom of speech against government interference.
By presenting scientifically based knowledge, Uno Vita AS wants to contribute to an informed dialogue about innovative technologies for general health and well-being.
References
-
Sun et al. (2009). Effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on chondrocytes. PubMed.
-
Kaivosoja et al. (2015). The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on osteoblast differentiation. PubMed.
-
Crocetti et al. (2013). Low-frequency electromagnetic fields induce apoptosis in cancer cells. PubMed.
-
Iaccarino et al. (2016). Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load. PubMed.
-
Saino et al. (2011). Pulsed electromagnetic fields enhance proliferation. PubMed.
-
Barren (2007). Photobiology of low-power laser effects. PubMed.
-
Bjordal et al. (2008). Low-level laser therapy in acute pain. PubMed.
-
Cheng et al. (1982). Effects of electric currents on ATP generation. PubMed.
-
Fisher et al. (2018). Effects of photic stimulation on brain wave activity. PubMed.
-
Fassina et al. (2006). Effects of PEMF on bone extracellular matrix. PubMed.
-
Mert et al. (2014). High-frequency PEMF for nerve regeneration. PubMed.
-
Pasi et al. (2016). Biological effects of radiofrequency fields. PubMed.